Evening workouts may offer more benefits for metabolic health than morning exercises, especially when consuming a high-fat diet, according to a recent study. However, factors such as sleep disruption, small sample size, and the short duration of the study raise questions about the findings' broader applicability and significance.
In recent times, there's been considerable debate about the ideal time of day to exercise, particularly in the context of dietary habits and metabolic health. An intriguing study shed some light on this topic by analyzing the effects of evening exercise versus morning exercise on men consuming a high-fat, low-carb diet, commonly referred to as a low-carb, high-fat diet (LCHFD).
The study monitored 24 men, assessing various health metrics including aerobic fitness, cholesterol levels, and blood glucose. During the 11-day study, participants consumed pre-packed meals with a macronutrient composition of about 65% fat, 15% carbohydrate, and 20% protein. Post the initial dietary phase, participants were grouped into morning exercisers (6:30 AM), evening exercisers (6:30 PM), or a control group. Their exercise regimen involved a mix of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity training on stationary bikes.
Some noteworthy outcomes emerged:
- A high intake of fatty foods led to an increase in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels along with concerning molecular patterns in the bloodstream.
- Evening workouts appeared to counteract some of the adverse effects of the diet on metabolic health, leading to better overnight blood glucose control. In contrast, morning workouts didn't exhibit the same protective effects.
The lead investigator suggested that evening exercise might influence molecular clocks and gene expression more substantially than morning routines. However, the mechanisms behind these effects remain elusive.
While the results might seem alarming at first glance, it's essential to consider the broader context. For one, the duration of the study and the sample size (only eight participants per group) might limit the generalizability of the results.
A significant potential confounder is sleep disruption. Given the early morning exercise schedule, the majority of participants in the morning group had altered sleep patterns, which could have influenced metabolic health just as much as the exercise timing itself.
Moreover, while LDL-C levels did rise, the actual increase from 116 to 124 mg/dL doesn't necessarily signal a substantial health risk, especially given the dramatic dietary shift participants experienced just days prior. Conversely, fasting triglyceride (TG) levels showed a promising drop from 136 to 111 mg/dL.
Upon examining the exercise effects, both morning and evening exercise routines improved cardiorespiratory fitness. But only the evening exercisers exhibited further enhancements in glycemic control, showing reduced nocturnal glucose levels. However, this difference, while statistically significant, might not be of vast clinical significance.
An interesting takeaway would be comparing 24-hour glucose concentrations between morning and evening exercisers. Initially, the LCHFD significantly decreased glucose levels, but by the end of the experiment, no significant shifts in 24-hour glucose levels were observed within either exercise group.
While the study provides a fascinating perspective on the interplay between exercise timing, diet, and metabolic health, it also underscores the complexities inherent in such research. Multiple variables, from sleep patterns to blood sampling times, can influence results. As we continue our quest for optimal health and fitness strategies, it's crucial to critically examine scientific findings and consider the broader context in which they emerge.
